Advertisement

Management of surgical instruments at loaner companies in upper-middle and high-income countries: The other side of the coin

      Highlights

      • Multiple failures to meet recommended practices were detected in loaner companies.
      • Multifaceted loaner system management challenges need to be tackled.
      • Standardised requirements and improvements in process verification are needed.

      Abstract

      Background

      The complex and specific surgical instruments (SI) acquired from loaner companies are provided non-sterile and must be reprocessed before each use. We evaluated the management practices of SI in loaner companies in a high (Australia) and a middle-income (Brazil) country.

      Methods

      Seven company managers in Australia and eight in Brazil replied to the self-administrated survey.

      Results

      Failures to meet recommended practices were detected, including standard operating procedure (SOP) provision, minimum delivery time, transport container and decontamination in loaner companies in both countries. Six of seven loaner companies in each country provided SOP for instrument reprocessing (one company in Brazil did not reply). Solicitation of the SI may occur 12 h before need in Brazil, and delivery of the set could be accepted 4 h before surgery in both countries. Transport of SI on stainless steel/aluminium trays was reported by 42.85% and 28.6% of companies in Brazil and Australia, respectively. In Australia, 57.1% of the loaner companies affirmed they performed cleaning only if the SI were visibly dirty. In Brazil, 62.5% of the companies reported they use alcohol to wipe SI.

      Conclusions

      There is a need for standardisation of requirements and process verification improvement in loaner SI reprocessing and management.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Infection, Disease & Health
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Seavey R.
        Reducing the risks associated with loaner instrumentation and implants.
        AORN J. 2010; 92: 322-334https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.032
        • Winthrop T.G.
        • Sion B.A.
        • Gaines C.
        Loaner instrumentation: processing the unknown.
        AORN J. 2007; 85: 566-573https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(07)60128-8
        • Costa D.M.
        • Lopes L.K.O.
        • Vickery K.
        • Watanabe E.
        • Vasconcelos L.S.N.O.L.
        • de Paula M.C.
        • et al.
        Reprocessing safety issues associated with complex-design orthopaedic loaned surgical instruments and implants.
        Injury. 2018; 9: 2005-2012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.006
        • Tipple A.F.V.
        • Costa D.M.
        • Lopes L.K.O.
        • Veloso T.R.
        • Pereira L.A.
        • Hu H.
        • et al.
        Reprocessing of loaned surgical instruments/implants in Australia and Brazil: a survey of those at the coalface.
        Infect Dis Health. 2021; S2468–0451: 46-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2021.09.003
        • Hughes C.
        Are instruments sterile or did they just get hot?.
        Mater Manag Health Care. 2010; 19: 34
        • Young M.
        Putting teeth in your loaner set policy.
        OR manager. 2011; 27 (6): 22-23
        • American Society For Healthcare Central Service Professionals/International Association Of Healthcare Central Service Materiel Management
        ASHCSP/IAHCSMM. ASHCSP/IAHCSMM position paper on Loaner Instrumentation.
        2011 (Available at:)
        • Huter-Kunish G.G.
        Processing loaner instruments in an ambulatory surgery center.
        AORN J. 2009; 89: 861-870
        • Joint Technical Committee HE-023, Processing of Medical and Surgical Instruments. Australian/New Zealand Standard. AS/NZS 4187:2014
        Reprocessing of reusable medical devices in health service organizations.
        26 November 2014 (Australia: Sydney)
        • Costa D.M.
        • Lopes L.K.O.
        • Hu H.
        • Tipple A.F.V.
        • Vickery K.
        Alcohol fixation of bacteria to surgical instruments increases cleaning difficulty and may contribute to sterilization inefficacy.
        Am J Infect Control. 2017; 45: e81-e86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.04.286